This article was originally published at: https://herforward.com/explosive-privacy-battle-engulfs-platform-x/

Elon Musk’s social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, has been described as a “chaotic environment” by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) in a recent court document amid ongoing disputes related to privacy concerns.

Privacy Concerns on Platform X

Prior to Musk’s acquisition, the social media company faced a $150 million penalty for breaching data privacy regulations, and it has since been closely monitored by the DOJ for possible violations of Federal Trade Commission (FTC) orders. Despite the changes implemented by Musk since the acquisition, the DOJ claims that users’ privacy remains at serious risk, as the platform continues to attract controversial discussions and permit questionable content.

Moreover, critics argue that the platform’s revamped policies and lack of clear-cut guidelines have done little to rectify the situation, leaving many users uncertain about the extent of data protection and their own security on platform X.

Previous Data Privacy Violations and Fines

X was required to pay a $150 million fine in May as part of a legal settlement regarding accusations of improper handling of user information. The FTC stated that between 2013 and 2019, X had told users that their email addresses and phone numbers were solely for account security reasons, but they were also used for targeted advertising.

This misled users to believe their personal information was being protected, when in fact it was being utilized for the company’s financial gain. The settlement highlights the need for more robust enforcement of privacy policies and increased transparency on how companies handle consumer data.

Privacy Measures Implemented by Elon Musk

After Musk took over and key privacy officials resigned, X was subjected to more rigid data privacy rules, including periodic evaluations by independent entities. These evaluations ensured the company’s compliance with data protection and privacy regulations, ultimately aiming to safeguard users’ personal information. Additionally, under Musk’s leadership, X implemented robust measures to address potential data breaches and strengthen overall security, further emphasizing the company’s commitment to user privacy.

Musk and X Request Termination of FTC Order

In July, X asked a federal court to end the FTC’s order and shield Elon Musk from deposition. The legal team argued that the deposition would be an unnecessary burden on the CEO and could potentially distract him from running his companies efficiently. Furthermore, they highlighted that Musk has already provided ample information and resources to the court, emphasizing that his deposition would not reveal any new or groundbreaking information.

DOJ Pushes Back, Claiming Insufficient Data Privacy Measures

Nonetheless, in a court filing on Monday, US government lawyers from the DOJ argued that X has not met the necessary data privacy criteria to have the 2022 order dismissed. They pointed out specific shortcomings in X’s data protection policies and practices, highlighting potential risks to users’ data security. Furthermore, the DOJ emphasizes the importance of stringent data privacy measures to ensure consumer protection and maintain trust in the digital ecosystem.

Staff Exodus Raises Questions About Platform Security

Depositions revealed that nearly half of Twitter’s security, governance, risk, and compliance staff left the company after Musk’s takeover, leading to concerns over the platform’s ability to protect users and their data. This exodus of experienced personnel has prompted questions about the future effectiveness of Twitter’s security measures and compliance with data protection laws.

Unassigned Privacy-Program Controls Pose Risks

As a result of the staff departures, 37% of X’s privacy-program controls were left unassigned to specific personnel for oversight. This lack of clear assignment not only leads to confusion within the organization but also increases the risk of privacy-related incidents occurring. To ensure the effectiveness of privacy-program controls, it is crucial for X to promptly designate appropriate personnel for overseeing each aspect, fostering a sense of responsibility and accountability within the team.

Conclusion: The Future of Privacy on Platform X

In the face of the ongoing legal battles and concerns raised by the DOJ, platform X must prioritize the protection of user privacy and establish clear guidelines for its data handling procedures. By addressing the existing gaps in its policies and ensuring that all privacy-program controls are overseen by designated personnel, the platform may be able to rebuild consumer trust and create a more secure environment for its users.

The outcome of these legal disputes will play a crucial role in defining the future of platform X and the extent to which user privacy is protected on social media platforms.

FAQ: Privacy Concerns on Platform X

What were the previous data privacy violations and fines faced by Platform X?

Platform X was fined $150 million as part of a legal settlement for improper handling of user information between 2013 and 2019. They misled users by stating that their email addresses and phone numbers were used solely for account security when in fact they were utilized for targeted advertising.

What privacy measures were implemented by Elon Musk?

After taking over Platform X, Elon Musk implemented more rigid data privacy rules, including periodic evaluations by independent entities. He also introduced robust measures to address potential data breaches and strengthen overall security, demonstrating a commitment to user privacy.

Why did Musk and Platform X request termination of the FTC order?

In July, Musk and Platform X requested the termination of the FTC’s order, arguing that a deposition would be an unnecessary burden on Musk and could distract him from efficiently running his companies. They also claimed that he had already provided enough information and resources to the court.

Why did the DOJ push back and claim insufficient data privacy measures?

The DOJ argued that Platform X has not met the necessary data privacy criteria to have the order dismissed. They pointed out shortcomings in the platform’s data protection policies and practices, highlighting potential risks to users’ data security and the importance of maintaining trust in the digital ecosystem.

How does the staff exodus raise questions about platform security?

Depositions revealed that nearly half of Platform X’s security, governance, risk, and compliance staff left the company after Musk’s takeover. This raised concerns over the platform’s ability to protect users and their data, as well as the future effectiveness of its security measures and compliance with data protection laws.

What risks are posed by unassigned privacy-program controls?

With 37% of Platform X’s privacy-program controls unassigned to specific personnel for oversight, there is an increased risk of privacy-related incidents. Clear assignment of responsibilities is essential to prevent confusion within the organization and foster accountability and responsibility among team members.

What can be done to improve privacy on Platform X?

To improve privacy on Platform X, the platform needs to prioritize user privacy protection, establish clear guidelines for data handling procedures, and ensure that all privacy-program controls are overseen by designated personnel. This will help rebuild consumer trust and create a more secure environment for users.

First Reported on: businessinsider.com
Featured Image Credit: Photo by EKATERINA BOLOVTSOVA; Pexels; Thank you!

The post Explosive Privacy Battle Engulfs Platform X appeared first on Under30CEO.

This article was originally published at: https://herforward.com/explosive-privacy-battle-engulfs-platform-x/

Her Forward

2ff167582d05bd77c691dabdd36e6e68

Her Forward is a US news publication founded by Michael Peres (Mikey Peres) in 2021. Our publication is dedicated to bringing you the latest news and insights on female entrepreneurs and leaders.